Monday, June 3, 2013

Translate This!


We have really everything in common with America nowadays except, of course, language.
Oscar Wilde

England and America are two countries separated by the same language.
George Bernard Shaw

How true this is!  Trust me when I say that I've put my foot in it several times in the past.  Below are not only  examples of some of the blunders I’ve made, but other terms that cause confusion.

Suspenders:  Men’s suspenders (as Americans called them) were very popular in London’s financial district in the 1980s.   However, I made the mistake of going into a gentlemen’s clothier to buy a pair of suspenders for my husband as a birthday present.  The big-eyed clerk hastily told me that theirs was respectable establishment and walked away in a huff.   What I should have asked for was braces.  They are the things that hold up men’s trousers.  Suspenders, on the other hand, hold up ladies stockings.

Pants:  My mother-in-law nearly fainted when I told her, in a recent discussion about laundry, that I didn’t wash my husband’s pants after every wear. I meant his chinos. She, on the other hand, actually thought I was sending him to work wearing unwashed underwear.

Knickers:  In a conversation about 1970s fashion, I waxed lyrical about a really cute pair of denim knickers that I wore in high school.  They came below the knee a la Benjamin Franklin.  This brought a barrage of questions:  Denim knickers?  Wasn’t that horribly uncomfortable?   What would you wear with it?  My answers:  Yes, no, and that I usually wore them with a white blouse.  This was followed by blank and/or horrified stares.  How was I to know that knickers are what they call ladies underpants?  I’m not sure if they were more horrified by the thought of denim panties or the fact that they thought I was discussing my undergarments in public.

Biscuits:  I made biscuits and stew for dinner the other night and realized that there is no word for American biscuits in British English.  If asked, I guess I could describe biscuits as somewhere between a dinner roll and a savoury scone.  In the UK, a biscuit is a generic name for a cookie.

Pudding/dessert/afters:  All can mean the sweet course at the end of a meal, but the most commonly used is pudding.   Pudding in the generic can mean cake, ice cream, or a pudding.  A pudding, however, is not the creamy dessert made famous by Jello (that would be a blancmange, custard, mousse, or soufflĂ©).  Instead, a pudding is a type of heavy steamed cake.  Think of Christmas or Plum Pudding.

Nought:  Used mostly in the North, it means nothing – as in “I know nought about it.”

Mince: can either be ground meat (beef, lamb, or pork) or can be the raisin filling for a pie, also nice for pudding.  Mince pies and sherry are the traditional goodies left out for Father Christmas.

Father Christmas:  Santa Claus

Bap: A large roll; also the name of the sandwich made on a bap.

Jacket potato:  A baked potato usually topped with things like tuna salad (called tuna mayonnaise), baked bean and cheese, or prawns (small shrimp) with Marie Rose sauce.

Marie Rose sauce:  Mayonnaise and ketchup mixed together.  Sounds awful, but is actually wonderful with prawns.

Take-away: A take out.

Nappy:  A diaper.

Jumper:  A ladies sweater.

Pram (short for perambulator):   A traditional baby carriage.  This is the big four-wheeled thing you see often see nanny’s pushing around in the US.  They used to be popular, but now nearly everyone uses a pushchair, which is a stroller.

Jumble or jumble sale:  A flea market or white elephant sale

Car boot:  The trunk of a car.  Also another term for a flea market.

Bonnet:  Car hood

Full stop:  Period; as in the sentence ends in a full stop.

Flat: An apartment

Puncture: a flat tire

Fixtures list:  A sports schedule.  When looking on a team's website you generally won't find the team schedule; however, you will find when they are playing on the fixtures list.

Post:  Mail.  This can be used as both a noun and a verb.  Did the post come yet?  I need to post this letter.

Sponge: a cake, as in a Victoria Sponge, excellent for pudding.

If you can think of others, feel free to add to my list!

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

The Red Budget Box



Not having access to daily news in the US means I’m not as in touch as I could be.  (Yes, I know I can get the news online, but it was much easier when got a daily paper and could turn on the evening news).  What did make headlines here recently is Congress’s inability to pass a budget and the subsequent “fiscal cliff.”  Doing a little digging online I’ve discovered that the Senate has not passed a budget since 2009.   In fact, they’ve only met the March 1st deadline four times in the last 30 years.[1] 

This topic only came to mind because today the Chancellor of the Exchequer (the Cabinet Minister responsible for economic and financial matters) left Number 11 Downing Street holding up a small, red briefcase known as the Budget Box for a mass of waiting photographers.   In it was the annual budget statement to Parliament, whereby the government lays out how taxpayer money will be spent in the coming year.[2]   Here there is no party bickering on what funds are sacrosanct, nor are there debates or stalling tactics on the floor of the Commons.  (The snarky comments all come after the budget is read.)  In fact, the budget is not created by parliament at all. Instead the budget is the product of a select few:  the Chancellor, several high-level Treasury Ministers, and the Prime Minister.  The contents of the budget report are not discussed outside of this golden circle, its details being held in the strictest of confidence until Budget Day.   

When the time comes, the outline of the budget is presented first to the Queen.  By tradition, the Chancellor dines with her the night before as he briefs her on its contents.  Cabinet Ministers are next, by which time the budget is, according to Rodney Brazier, professor of constitutional law at Manchester University, “a fait accompli.”[3]  Ministers may ask for minor changes, but nothing more.  The Chancellor then addresses Parliament later that day.  If the country is unhappy with the way the government decides to spend their money, they can express it at the next election.
Two things are significant about that last statement and differ greatly from the US:  the concept of government and the electoral process.  

In US national elections, one votes for candidates representing two branches within the federal system – one's Congressional representative (legislative) and the president (executive).   As is often the case, the president and Congressional majority leaders are members of different parties.  In the UK, the Prime Minister is chosen not by popular vote, but is simply the leader of the party that wins the most seats in Parliament.  So the majority leader is then the leader of the country as a whole.  The winning leader then “forms a new government.”  You can hear this simply by terms used to describe political chronology:  the Reagan administration vs. the Thatcher government. It can also be used to describe the party in control i.e., the Labor government, the coalition government.

While elections in the US are held on a regular non-movable schedule, general elections in the UK are more flexible.  Elections must be called at least every five years  (the date of the next general election is tentatively scheduled for May 7, 2015); however, this is not set is stone.  Two things can happen to bring an early election:  a two-thirds vote in the House of Commons for an early election or a vote of no confidence.  The ruling party usually calls for an early election if things are going well and popularity is high.  After all, if your party is ahead in the polls, why not strike while the iron is hot?  Historically, this is usually done in year four of a particular government.  The vote of no confidence is complicated, but is generally a consensus that the current government is not working and parliament basically wants to start over. [4]  Once an election is called, whatever the reason, anyone can run for office provided they submit the appropriate forms and a £500 fee. [5]  And boy do they!  In the recent Eastleigh by-election (the former MP resigned after a scandal) the following parties were represented on the ballot: [6]   
Liberal Democrats – winner with 13,342 out of 41,616 votes
UK Independent - 11,571 votes
Conservative -10,559 votes
Labor - 4,088 votes
Independent -768 votes
National Health Action – 392 votes
Beer, Baccy and Crumpet Party – 235 votes
The Christian Party – 163 votes
Monster Raving Loony William Hill Party – 136 votes.  Don’t laugh, the Loony Party have actually won some county and town seats.
Peace Party – 128 votes
The Elvis Loves Pets Party – 72 votes
English Democrats – 70 votes
Trade Union and Socialist Coalition – 62 votes
Wessex Regionalists – 30 votes

Once registered, candidates usually have only four to six weeks to campaign.  That means no high-end fundraisers, no endless television ads, and, because all voting is local, no nationally televised debates.  Politics here seems to be on a more grassroots level, with your local MP being just that: local.  Whether it is or not remains to be seen.  In the meantime, I’m dying to know what’s in that red box.







[1] Phil Roe (Rep. T-Tenn), “Congress must pass a budget,” The Hill’s Congressional Blog, (http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-a-budget/277719-congress-must-pass-a-budget) 17 January 2013 [accessed 20 March 2013] and Suzy Kim, “Senate Democrats promise to pass a budget.  Why is this a big deal?,” The Washington Wonk Blog, (http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/ wp/2013/01/20/senate-democrats-promise-to-pass-a-budget/), 20 January 2013 [accessed 20 March 2013]
[2] “Guide to the Budget,” HM Treasury (http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/about_budget.htm)
[3] Rodney Brazier, Ministers of the Crown (Oxford:  Oxford University Press, 1997), 151-152
[4] “Parliament and Government,” UK Parliament, http://www.parliament.uk/about
/how/role/parliament-government/, [accessed 20 March 2013].  This replaces the old system (changed in 2011) whereby the Prime Minister would simply ask the Queen to dissolve Parliament without the two-thirds vote.
[5] “Standing for Parliament,” UK Parliament, http://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/elections/standing/ [accessed 20 March 2013].
[6] “Eastleigh 2013 by-election:  full results and charts,” The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2013/mar/01/eastleigh-byelection-results-2013#data [accessed 20 March 2013]

Monday, March 11, 2013

Negotiating the Red Tape Jungle


It’s been nearly two months since we arrived in the UK and we are still in temporary accommodations.  It’s decent enough, but I’ll be glad when we get into a place of our own.  The problem with starting over is that you have no record of any type.  I suppose there are situations where this could be helpful. The reality is that lacking the necessary documentation can cause a dangerously circular situation:  in order to get a bank account you must provide proof of address; however, not having a bank account makes it virtually impossible to find a place to live without a great deal of money upfront.  We can prove who we are, but since we are renting a holiday cottage we don’t pay utility bills or council tax – the documents needed for address authentication.  I understand that proof of address is needed for anti-money laundering compliance, but it didn’t change the fact that we didn’t have anything to show.  Fortunately for us, the large corporation that brought us here in the first place has agreements with several nationwide banks and they were able to take care of opening our account at the corporate level.  This, as you can imagine, takes time – in our case about two weeks. 

The bank account issue reared its ugly head again when we went looking for a car and set out to buy car insurance.  We had the funds in our US account to pay for coverage; however, the system at the insurance brokers wouldn’t allow us to use our US bankcard.  (I suspect this has to do with preventing money laundering as well.)  As our UK account hadn’t been finalized our only payment option was to set up a high-interest monthly installment account.  We were able to pay the balance in full as soon as we received the cards for the UK account the following week, but it was still an unexpected hassle.  We also couldn’t take our 10+ years of no-claims discounts with us.  We’re insured as if this were our first car.  We had a letter from our agent in the US, but it didn’t matter.  No record in the UK, no deal.  The up side is that the insurance certificate was sent to the holiday cottage, meaning we have proof of address if we need it again.

Now that the bank account issue was settled we assumed that we wouldn’t run into any further problems.  We found a house we loved and submitted an application to lease it.  I thought it would be similar to renting in Columbus where we did the entire thing over the Internet.  We filled out the application and paid the fee online.  A couple days later the management company sent us the lease, we signed it and mailed it back with a check.  Process complete.  Here the process is a bit more involved.  Employer, personal, and most importantly, bank references are required and thoroughly checked.  Our references are all solid, so we shouldn’t have a problem, right?  Well, our account hasn’t been open long enough for the bank to give us a reference.  In order for the bank to verify that we regularly have enough money in our account to pay the rent, the account had to have been open and active for at least two years.  Since the traditional bank reference wasn't available the agency agreed to take six months of statements instead.  Our account hadn’t been open for six weeks let alone six months!  We thought we were going to lose the house.  Luckily our relocation company was able to step in and help because the next option was to pay six months rent up front!  That would have wiped us out.

Of course, these requirements may differ depending on what area of the country you’re in, which agency you are dealing with, and the individual landlord.  The bank requirements to open an account, however, are generally non-negotiable.  So what to do?  I found this great article on Moneyfacts.co.uk with some useful suggestions on how to open an account in the UK if you find yourself in the same situation as us.  I just wish I had found it six months ago.

The agent for the house told us that they would be putting the final touches on the lease and would have it to us this week so we could look it over.  I assumed that once we receive it that would be it – we’d sign it, send it back, and move in on the agreed date.  Nope.  In the UK you sign the lease contract and get the keys on the same day that you move in.  The same day.  I guess when all is said and done it isn't that much of a hardship, but it is one more thing for me to to worry about on the day.  In any case, we are scheduled to do all this next week.  Fingers crossed that nothing changes between now and then. 

We are fortunate that my husband's company took care of so much of the red-tape for us.  I don't remember any of this the last time we lived here, but that was a long time ago and in a much different world.  I wonder how others do it?

Bureaucracy aside, life here is actually rather nice.  Our new home is in a lovely market town on the south coast.  Stay tuned!


Thursday, December 13, 2012

Here We Go Again...

Exactly eleven months ago today I closed up our home in Baltimore, Maryland and drove through a snowstorm (in a Miata, no less) to start a new life in Columbus, Ohio.  Baltimore is my hometown, and I love it, but we had been there long enough and I was ready for a change.  The move to Columbus had come just at the right time.  But here I am, eleven months later, talking to my husband's company's relocation team about our next move - this time across the pond to the UK.  

This isn't my first time living in England, but last time was over twenty years ago.  A lot has changed, as have I.  This blog will document my journey from the American mid-west to the south coast of England.  Hope you enjoy it.